Hume sought to produce an argument against miracles that would amount to an everlasting check to all kinds of superstitious delusion and consequently will be useful as long as the world endures rather than presenting one argument hume presented three but it has been shown that none of the arguments are convincing even granted a . Perhaps the most well articulated argument against jesus miracles comes from david hume the great eighteenth century scottish philosopher youre probably already familiar with it but in case you need a refresher here is his argument in a nutshell human experience confirms the certainty of the laws of nature. Explain humes argument against miracles firstly we must begin with what hume defines miracles as hume states that a miracle is a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent by this hume means to suggest that a miracle is a breaking of a law of nature by the . Summary david hume in of miracles section x of an enquiry concerning human understanding claimed either that because a miracle would be a violation of the laws of nature miracles are impossible or that one cannot have a justified belief that a miracle occurredthis argument has evoked an enormous amount of discussion both criticising the argument and endorsing the argument. This is the nub of humes argument in this first part it might benefit from being reformulated in the language of probability theory but its gist is tolerably clear he is not mounting a full argument against the plausibility of testimonial evidence for miracles he is simply pointing out that the standard is exceptionally high
How it works:
1. Register Trial Account.
2. Download The Books as you like ( Personal use )